Yes, it's impossible to review 'Casino' without mentioning Martin Scorsese's other gangster epic of the nineties, 'Goodfellas.' If you're feeling cruel, you could call the former a shameless rip-off of the latter (and substandard to boot). However, for all 'Casino's' similarities, it's not without its (brutal!) charms.

I think the main problem with 'Casino' is 'Goodfellas' itself. If you've seen what came before then you'll be unable to help but compare the two. 'Goodfellas' is possibly the greatest gangster film of the nineties (and beyond?), therefore nothing is going to live up it - even something which is basically made by the same people.
If you like 'Goodfellas' (and, if you're into gangster films in general) then you should like 'Casino' - it's certainly a good film with excellent performances, so, if you don't mind the foul language and violence associated with the genre you should have a blast here. Maybe the best way to enjoy 'Casino' is to watch it first, i.e. before 'Goodfellas' (if that's possible!)? My main gripe was that I found there to be a little bit too much narration for my liking. I know many films have a narrator who mainly opens and closes the story. However, there were different characters narrating and it went on all the way through the film. Anyway, that's a minor gripe. Don't judge it too harshly or be put off with the - undeniable - similarities to 'Goodfellas' - it may not be 'Goodfellas,' but it is good.
7/10 if I woke up on Groundhog Day and had to watch this again, I could live with that
No comments:
Post a Comment