I know that the original ‘Back to the Future’ film was ‘lightning in a bottle’ (or should that be a ‘Flex Capacitor in a bottle?’) and its sheer charm and mass appeal could never truly be recaptured. Therefore ‘Part II’ was always going to have a hard job when it came to competing. I was only twelve when it was released and, in short, I loved it. However, even back then long before the days of internet message boards and Twitter, I remember picking up on the mutterings from film critics about how it wasn’t a patch on the original. Now, I’m not about to commit blasphemy and tell you that it is. I’m just saying that it’s a great, fun film and it continues the story just perfectly.

However, that's just my opinion and I think it's fair to address some of the criticisms it picked up then and now. Some people resent a few casting changes that occurred between films, others say that the future is too over-the-top, plus it retreads old ground (sometimes remaking scenes deliberately in homage to its own predecessor), but without any of the charm. While others resent the way it ends (I should warn you that it's designed to be a 'middle film,' therefore I'm guessing the film-makers had no plans to end the story with 'Part II.'
Personally, I didn't mind any of that. If I could nit-pick one single thing it would be something I note now about the story-telling 'suspension of disbelief' which seems to go hand in hand with all time travel movies. Namely something happens which causes 'time' to spew off in a different direction, but, due to the paradox this would actually cause, the plot falls apart on a plot hole. However, I didn't notice that when I was younger and I'm sure not going to let it ruin my enjoyment of the film now.
There are few movies nowadays that the whole family can sit down and enjoy (okay, maybe 'Ready Player One' will be one day), but, right now, all three 'Back to the Future' movies deserve their place in cinematic history. Watch it now before it gets remade!
9/10 almost as perfect as The Godfather
No comments:
Post a Comment