I think it’s fair to say that the original ‘Ghostbusters’ is a classic. Very few people will disagree with that. Therefore, due to its success, a sequel was inevitable. I remember watching ‘Ghostbusters II’ at twelve years old back in 1989 and absolutely loving it! As did every other one of my friends. It was only as I grew up (and possibly coupled with the rise of the internet) did I realise how – apparently – hated it was.

If I was really trying to be critical I could mention that it does seem a bit odd that, by all accounts, the city of New York has completely forgotten about how the Ghostbusters saved the world (and, sometimes, it’s even debateable whether the populous even BELIEVES in ghosts!). Plus it is a bit of a re-tread of the first movie’s plot, beat for beat (but no one seemed to mind that much when ‘Star Wars: The Force Awakens’ did that many years later!).
I’d never say it’s better than the original. That kind of praised is reversed for the ‘filmic elite’ and rarely happens at the best of times. However, just because it’s not as good doesn’t make it a bad film. It’s a perfect compendium piece to the original and, if you accept that, you should have fun with it. Now, if you REALLY want a bad and extremely pointless film, then check out the Ghostbusters remake (actually, don’t – stick with either of the originals, the eighties cartoon series or even the game on the PS3 when it comes to your fix of ghostbusting!).
8/10 The Force is definitely strong with this one
No comments:
Post a Comment