Sometimes, you see a film advertised and you think ’How can this possibly fail?’ Then, upon sitting through it, you wonder how the film-makers managed to make something that looked so awesome come across as so mediocre. And that’s what ‘Triple 9’ is – mediocre. It’s not bad. I didn’t hate it. I just thought that, judging by the acting talent on display, that it should have been so much more special than what it actually was.

The reason Triple 9 looked so good was the cast of characters – anything with Norman Reedus (or ‘Daryl’ from The Walking Dead) and Aaron Paul (or ‘Jessie’ from Breaking Bad) can’t be all bad, can it? Well, like I say, it’s not all bad, it’s just pretty forgettable. Apart from one scene that occurred around the middle of the film where the cops storm a drugs den – that’s pretty intense and comes across as well researched as to how real police would undertake such an operation. However, it’s been about a week since I watched Triple 9 and, apart from that and the meaning of the phrase ‘Triple 9’ itself, there really isn’t that much I can remember about it. Or rather than the actors I really wanted to see in the film aren’t in it as much as I’d hoped and, where they were, they were criminally underused.
I know I’m being harsh. But it’s just if you’ve seen as many ‘cops and robbers’ movies as I have over the years then you really need something very different to set one apart. And this one just didn’t have what I was looking for. Yes, it’s stylish and well-directed, plus you have the acting talent on offer and, if you’re looking for realism then you’ll find a fair amount of violence here. However, in the course of film history, I’m guessing that this will just be written off as yet another cops and robbers movie. Pity.
6/10 Should probably keep you awake if Freddy Krueger was haunting your nights
No comments:
Post a Comment